
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch What You Say</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reputationforward.com/2009/06/big-world-keeps-getting-smaller.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reputationforward.com/2009/06/big-world-keeps-getting-smaller.html</link>
	<description>Corporate, Brand, Issues and Reputation Management Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gale</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationforward.com/2009/06/big-world-keeps-getting-smaller.html#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationforward.charlestonorwig.com/?p=139#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I agree that the 140 character format is frustrating. I&#039;ve been on a number of &quot;discussions&quot; with same. Regardless, what we put out there stays out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the 140 character format is frustrating. I&#8217;ve been on a number of &#8220;discussions&#8221; with same. Regardless, what we put out there stays out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.reputationforward.com/2009/06/big-world-keeps-getting-smaller.html#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationforward.charlestonorwig.com/?p=139#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Sure, it is ideal to keep in mind that what we type online is lasting and can be used in ways both positive and negative no matter the situation. However, one can say that a person&#039;s opinion and stance shouldn&#039;t hold much weight at only 140 characters long. We don&#039;t solve problems, or have debates, with only a few words. Obviously this is getting to be a tad verbose, but better to have explain this than have it confused for a small &quot;twit&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it is ideal to keep in mind that what we type online is lasting and can be used in ways both positive and negative no matter the situation. However, one can say that a person&#8217;s opinion and stance shouldn&#8217;t hold much weight at only 140 characters long. We don&#8217;t solve problems, or have debates, with only a few words. Obviously this is getting to be a tad verbose, but better to have explain this than have it confused for a small &#8220;twit&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

